News:

BEFORE POSTING read our Guidelines.

Main Menu

Brahms' 'Sinfonia'

Started by Alan Howe, Thursday 15 December 2011, 10:07

Previous topic - Next topic

Alan Howe

An intriguing release from Signum Classics contains an orchestration of the original version of Brahms' Piano Trio, Op.8...
http://www.mdt.co.uk/MDTSite/product//SIGCD191.htm

This is what Joseph Swensen who did the orchestration has written:

Sinfonia in B (original 1854 version of Trio, op.8 by Johannes Brahms)
orchestrated by Joseph Swensen (2007)


Programme Note

This work, which I have entitled "Sinfonia in B", is my orchestration of the little-known
original version of Brahms' B major piano trio. Completed in 1854, it is the largest and
arguably the most important of Brahms' published early works, yet it remains nearly
unknown to most musicians and music-lovers alike.
 
This phenomenon is the result of Brahms' apparent dissatisfaction with the work (hence
his revision of it over three decades later), and his rather strange decision to list the
revised work as opus 8 (the opus of the original) in spite of the fact that it is nearly 75
percent newly composed music and should have a listing closer to opus 110! Yet, in a
letter to his publisher Fritz Simrock (dated 13 December 1890) Brahms seems to cite
commercial and technical reasons for undertaking the revision rather than purely artistic
ones: '...with regard to the refurbished trio...I simply want to say that the old one will
continue to sell poorly not because so much of it is ugly, but because so much of it is
unnecessarily difficult.'
 
The original opus 8 is, for me, intriguing for many reasons. Not only is it a work of
extraordinary quality and emotional depth, written by a composer just 21 years of age,
but it is a quintessential example of Brahms' ultra-romantic and forward looking early
style; a style deeply influenced by his mentor Robert Schumann, whose bizarre and
wonderful violin concerto was completed just the year before Brahms' op 8 was
published. That very year saw the young Johannes Brahms in the company of even
more radical voices than that of his mentor. In his letter to Joseph Joachim (dated 7
December 1853) Brahms writes: 'Berlioz praised me with such exceeding and heartfelt
warmth that others meekly repeated his words...  Liszt is coming back on Monday.' 
(One can hardly avoid thinking of Liszt and Berlioz when one hears the crazed fugue in
the first movement of Brahms' 1854 trio). 
This early period came to an abrupt ending when Schumann attempted suicide for the
first time. The original opus 8 trio was to be the last work Brahms wrote before a hiatus
of six years in which he published not a single piece of music! When comparing the
original op 8 with the revised version, one can clearly hear that nearly all of the fantasyfilled wandering and subjectively emotional 'Schumannesque' music  of the original was
replaced by typically late period Brahms: concise and intense, an economical pursuit of
the classical ideal. This is a perfect example not only of Brahms' conscious rejection of
Schumann and of course Wagner, but also of his adversity to the whole GermanAustrian romantic musical revolution which found its ultimate and inevitable end just over
half a century later in Schoenberg's absolute annihilation of tonality!
 
My original impetus for writing this orchestration was to somehow resurrect this great
work, and thereby share my love for it with those who may never have the opportunity to
hear it otherwise. The greatest dilemma for me was how to treat Brahms' extraordinary
virtuoso piano writing. This material, transcribed for the orchestra could never resemble
Brahms' own very conservative orchestration style. My choice was between emulating
Brahms' own orchestrations – all products of his later post-Schumann period – or being
true to the material itself. I chose the latter, with great enthusiasm, to such a degree that
every single note which exists in the original has found its way into the orchestral 2
version. The result is an orchestration where the abilities of every player are stretched to
the limit and where the orchestra as a virtuoso instrument is exploited to the same
degree that Brahms exploited the limits of the piano. More importantly, it results in a
more 'forward-looking' orchestral sound world than one is accustomed to in his later
orchestral works. My hope is that this orchestration acts as a mirror reflecting the
mentality of this surprisingly radical, idiosyncratic and incredibly romantic, 21 year old
Johannes Brahms.
Joseph Swensen, 16 September 2008

http://www.josephswensen.com/downloads/sinfonia_in_b_programme_note.pdf