http://sdtom.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/les-ruses-damourglazunov/ (http://sdtom.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/les-ruses-damourglazunov/)
This was a recent re-release from Naxos. It was originally a marco polo (8.220485) from 1992. I like it although I admit to being fond of Glazunov.
Thomas
I like Glazunov. He was a very good orchestrator who wrote an excellent (in my opinion) violin concerto, but I haven't been too impressed with his piano music. I would not say though that I prefer Glazunov to other relatively unsung Russian composers, like Balakirev or Glinka. I'm also interested in Dargomyzhsky (or however you spell it), but I've only heard a few minutes of his work.
I started listening to Glazunov by starting with his symphonies. There are 19 CD's now available on Naxos of his material. You might check out the Naxos website to sample some of his material.
Thomas
Try the Serebrier symphonies on Warner - here is a conductor who really understands this repertoire. Magnificent. Start with Symphony No.5...
Your a good promoter Alan!!! Can you enlighten us a little more?
To start with, Serebrier was a protégé of Stokowski and also worked with Szell. He is an extremely fine technician and has the ability to conjure wonderful sounds from the orchestras he works with. Secondly, Serebrier is a bit of a Glazunov enthusiast, which is a big plus! This combination of factors makes him an ideal conductor for Glazunov's symphonies - something clearly borne out by his cycle on Warner.
I've always liked Glazunov, but I feel like I've heard more negative things about him from critics, etc.
Who cares about the critics? Especially when they're wrong!
I really have to agree with Alan on this one. I have the 19 Naxos releases and for the most part enjoy Glazunov's work.
Thomas
Quote from: Alan Howe on Saturday 23 January 2010, 18:06
Try the Serebrier symphonies on Warner - here is a conductor who really understands this repertoire. Magnificent. Start with Symphony No.5...
Yes -- if you can find it! It's out of print and unavailable in the US. There are some used copies out there on Ebay occassionally, but they go for $25 - $50!!!!
Serebrier's Glazunov symphonies are easily available as far as I can see. Try ordering, say, Symphony No.5 from Amazon UK...
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Glazunov-Symphony-No-5-Seasons/dp/B0002VE206/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1264666897&sr=8-2 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Glazunov-Symphony-No-5-Seasons/dp/B0002VE206/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1264666897&sr=8-2)
I find it fascinating that no one has spoken of the Neeme Järvi Cycle of Glazunov Symphonies on Orfeo. To me these are the Definitive versions. The Naxos versions of the Symphonies.....I find somehow cold and disinterested! I haven't heard the Serebrier version yet so I wouldn't know to compare, but I'm more than satisfied with the Järvi interpretation.
Quote from: Alan Howe on Thursday 28 January 2010, 00:05
Who cares about the critics? Especially when they're wrong!
Agreed. I really need to have that mindset that if I like it...who cares what someone else thinks! :)
Quote from: FBerwald on Thursday 28 January 2010, 08:44
. The Naxos versions of the Symphonies.....I find somehow cold and disinterested!
Don't forget sloooooooooow.
I've owned both the BIS cycle, and the Chandos cycle (on Brilliant). The later gets the slight edge, outside of Symphony #1 which for some reason is....well just weird (and also slow). Unfortunately, since Chandos never recorded #7, they put the BIS one, forcing me to sell the BIS set. Ugh, record companies.
I'm hoping in a couple years they'll box up the Serebrier.
Glazunov's No. 7 is very peculiar and catchy!!! He seems to be deliberately imitating Beetoven's Pastoral ... atleast in the I st movement.
As much as I enjoy Glazunov 19 volumes of material is where I'm going to stop I fear for lack of funds.
Thomas
My openness to Glazunov scored a major hit when as a kid who felt that post WWI works by Rachmaninov were not getting a fair hearing, I learned of Glazunov's role in the disastrous premier of R's extremely ambitious symphony 1. I wonder if anyone else had this experience?
Anyway, Serebrier's stunning version of Gliere Symphony 3, his role in the premier of Ives's Symphony 4, and especially Alan's strong response to his renditions of Glazunov have opened my mind again. I'm ordering Glazunov 5.
Quote from: chill319 on Sunday 31 January 2010, 21:53
My openness to Glazunov scored a major hit when as a kid who felt that post WWI works by Rachmaninov were not getting a fair hearing, I learned of Glazunov's role in the disastrous premier of R's extremely ambitious symphony 1. I wonder if anyone else had this experience?
I had trouble understanding Glazunov's motivation for sabotaging the premiere of Rach S 1 myself for a number of years until it hit me. The young Sergei was viewed as competition by Aleksandr. Evidently, giving your first symphony to someone who may perceive you as a competitor and rival isn't a very sound policy. There may have been a little more to it than that, too. I believe that I read somewhere that Glazunov was drunk when he conducted Rach 1, although I never heard that he had a drinking problem to the extent that Arensky did.
Quote from: JimL on Sunday 31 January 2010, 23:26
Quote from: chill319 on Sunday 31 January 2010, 21:53
My openness to Glazunov scored a major hit when as a kid who felt that post WWI works by Rachmaninov were not getting a fair hearing, I learned of Glazunov's role in the disastrous premier of R's extremely ambitious symphony 1. I wonder if anyone else had this experience?
I had trouble understanding Glazunov's motivation for sabotaging the premiere of Rach S 1 myself for a number of years until it hit me. The young Sergei was viewed as competition by Aleksandr. Evidently, giving your first symphony to someone who may perceive you as a competitor and rival isn't a very sound policy. There may have been a little more to it than that, too. I believe that I read somewhere that Glazunov was drunk when he conducted Rach 1, although I never heard that he had a drinking problem to the extent that Arensky did.
I read that Glazunov had a definite problem with alcohol. His relationship remained close to Shostakovich whose father had access to large supplies of alcohol.
"...I believe that I read somewhere that Glazunov was drunk when he conducted Rach 1, although I never heard that he had a drinking problem to the extent that Arensky did..."
In the alleged Shostakovich memoir "Testimony", Glazunov is portrayed as such a severe alcoholic that he kept a vodka bottle in his desk at the St. Petersburg Conservatory and drank from it through a straw while teaching. The book, however, is regarded by many as a forgery.
"...I read that Glazunov had a definite problem with alcohol. His relationship remained close to Shostakovich whose father had access to large supplies of alcohol..."
I believe this particular story also comes from Testimony. Considering the source, it must be treated with care. Which isn't to say that Glazunov wasn't an alcoholic. The story about him conducting Rach 1 drunk is an old one that comes from several sources. As for intentional sabotage, it seems unlikely to me that a man would remain director of a conservatory for almost thirty years if he was on a mission to destroy his students, but strange things happen.. Look at Henselt as teacher...brrrr....
David
"As for intentional sabotage, it seems unlikely to me that a man would remain director of a conservatory for almost thirty years if he was on a mission to destroy his students, but strange things happen."
The sauce, my friend, does strange things to a body.
That's for sure. I worked in a jazz club for 9 years and the deterioration of the bar regulars in that time was not pretty...
David
Quote from: chill319 on Sunday 31 January 2010, 21:53
My openness to Glazunov scored a major hit when as a kid who felt that post WWI works by Rachmaninov were not getting a fair hearing, I learned of Glazunov's role in the disastrous premier of R's extremely ambitious symphony 1. I wonder if anyone else had this experience?
Anyway, Serebrier's stunning version of Gliere Symphony 3, his role in the premier of Ives's Symphony 4, and especially Alan's strong response to his renditions of Glazunov have opened my mind again. I'm ordering Glazunov 5.
Apologies in advance!!!! I heard about the story of the disastrous premier of Rachmaninov's Ist symphony AFTER I heard a recording and my opinion of him improved :P The symphony is soooooooo long and ..seriously the Critique by César Cui about IT being " .....a programme symphony based on the story of the Ten Plagues of Egypt...." although very harsh, had some truth, I felt! Of course when I Ist heard the symphony, it was coupled with the Isle of the dead on the CD. And I heard it all in one sitting :o . Suffice to say I have yet to recover.
Back to Glazunov, He doesn't seem to have been a very good conductor despite Rimsky-Korsakov's assertions, and coupled with a lack of interest (or understanding), and obvious under-rehersal could have all lead to such an unfortunate incident!
Glazunov's No. 5 a powerful work- optimistic and Wagnerian! Listen to the last movement lively with a lot of Syncopations :)
César Cui and his criticism. Don't mention César Cui. What a pitiful creature. What is his contribution to the classical music inheritance? Nothing.
Glazunov may have been an alcoholic, but at least he left us some beautiful music. Something I cannot say of Cui.
when I said .. "I heard about the story of the disastrous premier of Rachmaninov's Ist symphony AFTER I heard a recording and my opinion of him improved :P" I meant Glazunov. I still cant quite get the Symphony no 1(Rachmaninov) .
As for Cui I agree that he was a spiteful creature who despised Beetovan and Mozart !!!. I was just referring to his comments . And I absolutely adore Glazunov. I still believe that his Symphonic cycle is the most under-appreciated. Even more so are the seven quartets. I have all of them . The 3rd is a must-hear!!!
Quote from: chill319 on Sunday 31 January 2010, 21:53
Anyway, Serebrier's stunning version of Gliere Symphony 3,
What? When did he do that (is it a concert?)
I guess we'll never know what really happened to Glazunov. Alcohol is a powerful drug that causes severe problems today in Russia. That much I can say.
Thomas
Not only in Russia, Thomas.
I like to listen to Glazunov while I'm drinking a good glass of wine ;)