Anyone know anything about a rumour going around that the RSNO has recorded an orchestration of the Bax Symphony in F with Yates & Dutton?
I'm now a little confused regarding which symphony this is. Could this rumour be about the un-finished symphony of Bax (1906/7)? If so this could be fascinating. Anyone any ideas or clues?
I've heard nothing.
Tom
I am sworn to secrecy. Patience. :-X
...which means that the rumour probably has legs. Watch this space...
Such intrigue.....if it is that un scored work, it is supposed to really long....if it's true this will be a massive coup for Dutton.....until we know more I can only wait with baited breath!
I can see you going red in the face already! Don't forget to breath out.... ;)
On the odd occasion when I've been able to drop a tantalising hint about an upcoming Raff release, I've had much more fun from how wrong people have guessed than I've had worries about correct guesses. ;)
I'm quite sure I am wholly naive and missing out on something obvious to others. But refusing to get excited about anything until I know what it is (maybe just as well I didn't espouse that view in my first teenage fumblings), I don't really grasp the point of all this cloak and daggers and lips sealed secrecy stuff.
Obviously if a person is told something in confidence then (s)he is bound to respect that confidence. But I don't see why record companies want to keep top secret future release plans. After all in the publishing world a publisher often says 'in the autumn we're going to publish a new biography of Frederick the Great'. That news can be of value to those interested in the subject, and it likewise benefits the publisher by preparing the way to a successful book launch.
So why the utter secrecy about recording or release plans? What's the justification for it? Wouldn't it be quite absurd for a concert organiser to book a venue, make a contract with musicians to perform in it, and then say: Tee hee, I'm not going to tell you what so and so is playing until the afternoon of the evening concert? What's the difference?
OK, I know 65 people will promptly rebuke me so I'll shut up!
I take your point, Peter, but I think that the difference is that in the book industry there's no chance of any other publisher bringing out a specific new book because the author has a contract with just the one publisher. In the classical recording industry, the music is generally out of copyright and so anybody can record it at any time, and labels are frightened of some other company trumping them by bringing out a competing recording. In this case, of course, if what is being recorded is an orchestration of an uncompleted work, then that concern probably wouldn't apply, at least initially.
I think with Dutton it's not so much secrecy as the very quick turnaround time for their releases. Example, they recorded the Matthews Vespers a few weeks ago for release in October/November. They had to hold the 7th Symphony recording to prepare a suitable disc-mate. I only knew about the release from the composer, not Dutton.
The recording last Friday also will be released in October/November. So that's fast. In the meantime any number of things can and do go wrong. Suppose the performer hears the edits and says "no way is that going out!" They have no time to change the release schedule if it's announced too soon.
A good example is the Foulds. Manuscript problems unforeseen has delayed it (maybe). Had I not mentioned it (shame) no one would even be expecting such a release. Now it may be delayed or postponed.
BTW the Bax symphony referred to above is a complete short score of 60 minutes! It was in the possession of Colin Scott-Sutherland all these years. So the actual MUSIC is all Bax. A huge, sloppy Romantic wallow. Yates did the orchestration based on many of Bax's notes in the score....and I've just said too much already. :-[
Hope that helps somewhat.
Many thanks Tapiola (and Mark). Yes, I can understand some very plausible responses to my previous question. And, crickey, there's sufficient in Tapiola's reply to lead to a sharp intake of air in preparation for a whoop of delight. But, of course, any public discussion would be idle tittle tattle and uninformed rumouring, and we won't have that!
Well now I'm holding my breath. Hope I can last out until.....whenever....
Well thanks for the info from everyone. Very interesting, this (if it is released) is going to be extraordinary. I don't know if I can wait! The Moeran 2nd was fantastic so there must be high hopes for the Yates/Bax then. No pressure for him!
"Whenever" will probably be the last week of October.
Thanks. Can't wait - but will have to....
is this in Composers and Music because it isn't a New Recording ... yet?
Tapiola reports elsewhere:
I can say it is a wonderful concoction of Straussian/Irish romantic swurls and themes were used in many future Bax works. You'll hear Irish folk-song coupled with Tchaikovskian emotion. Bax was 23 when he wrote it and was in love with every pretty girl in London under age 25.
He realized that a 60-minute symphony with a huge orchestra by an unknown 23 year old would never be performed in London, so he stopped at the short score and moved on to other conquests.
Martin Yates has not added a note of his own and taken Bax's orchestral comments and made a performing version. It's not a reconstruction like Elgar's 3rd or Moeran's 2nd.
Sounds like an intriguing must-buy to me.
Yes, me too. I phoned Dutton, but tight lips all round. I suppose it will be an important coup if it really does come through.
Dutton is NOT going to comment yet. I was reminded today not to talk about it just yet. :-[
I know the symphony is very long and there will be no disc mate. The editing process is not finished and Yates has not given it the green light yet.
Patience is a virtue.
ok, thanks for that info. I can't help trying to jump the gun!
If Bax's 1908 String Quintet is any indicator, the symphony could be as fine an addition to his list of symphonies as Kullervo is to Sibelius's. The ease with which Bax moves in and out of contrapuntal textures in the Quintet bespeaks a composer whose craft, if not his voice, is fully mature, and whose musical ideas are already arresting.
In case any members of this forum who like Bax have not yet heard the Somm recording of the 1939 Concertino for Piano and Orchestra, completed by Graham Partlett, I'll opine that for me it is, apart from the final Cooke/Mahler 10th, the finest such work I have ever heard.
Thank you for that recommendation. I will need to have a lookout for that one...
I have long admired the Parletts' work on Bax's behalf.
Partlett outdid himself here. I defy anyone but the most erudite scholar of Bax's works to detect Partlett in the result. One of the interesting aspects of the Concertino is that it uses great thick two-handed chords much more than earlier Bax concerted piano works. In this respect it sounds as if the textures of Vaughan Williams's then-recent Piano Concerto had intrigued Bax. Assuming that a recording of the Symphony in F is forthcoming (ahem), it will likewise be interesting to compare the 1907 Bax with the Vaughan Williams of the Overture to The Wasps, Toward the Unknown Region, etc.