Hi Alistair
You clearly know and love your Sorabji. I can therefore fully appreciate your comments regarding best versions, best recordings etc. I know only too well that there can be a huge difference in the interpretation of a work and I have in my own collection of multiple versions of symphonies, concertos, string quartets etc. where I have a distinct preference for a particular version! That said, I felt that you did not seem to rate very highly Michael Habermann's efforts at interpreting Sorabji
On the liner notes accompanying the 3 cds, it states that Habermann, albeit on only one occasion, actually performed some of the Sorabji works in the presence of Sorabji himself. And Sorabji declared himself very well pleased with Habermann's efforts! If that is indeed the case, I can't imagine that Habermann's interpretation could be considered "poor", even allowing for subjectivity! That said, I myself was unable to get into Sorabji's music. I know not everyone would agree, but I found the journey long, I was not sure where I was going and was just relieved to get to the end! I guess Sorabji is simply not my cup of tea but I do appreciate that many people love his music. To be as openminded as I can, I will perhaps come back to his music later on and see if I still feel the same way.
Cheers
Dennis
You clearly know and love your Sorabji. I can therefore fully appreciate your comments regarding best versions, best recordings etc. I know only too well that there can be a huge difference in the interpretation of a work and I have in my own collection of multiple versions of symphonies, concertos, string quartets etc. where I have a distinct preference for a particular version! That said, I felt that you did not seem to rate very highly Michael Habermann's efforts at interpreting Sorabji
![Huh? ???](https://www.unsungcomposers.com/forum/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
Cheers
Dennis