Thank you for all these comments.
Indeed, the association between a person's productivity and the quality of his environment is quite well established. It is however not so clear what is the causal effect. Are geographic clusters attracting the most productive individuals or are people who cluster more productive because of positive externalities associated with cluster locations? In other words, is self-selection driving the previous empirical evidence on better performance in geographic clusters, or does there exist a clustering benefit?
This question is perhaps of some interest to people who cluster and policymakers, and I hoped it would interest also people with some fascination in music...therefore my my post here. Sorry if it appears to be spamming...
* If you do not have access to the Journal of Urban Economics article, here is a link to an earlier working paper version: http://ideas.repec.org/p/tcd/tcduee/tep0611.html
Indeed, the association between a person's productivity and the quality of his environment is quite well established. It is however not so clear what is the causal effect. Are geographic clusters attracting the most productive individuals or are people who cluster more productive because of positive externalities associated with cluster locations? In other words, is self-selection driving the previous empirical evidence on better performance in geographic clusters, or does there exist a clustering benefit?
This question is perhaps of some interest to people who cluster and policymakers, and I hoped it would interest also people with some fascination in music...therefore my my post here. Sorry if it appears to be spamming...
* If you do not have access to the Journal of Urban Economics article, here is a link to an earlier working paper version: http://ideas.repec.org/p/tcd/tcduee/tep0611.html